I’d like to start putting down on paper an idea I’ve been chewing on for a while. It’s a big claim, which may or may not be true. But to figure out if it’s true, it needs to be developed. So here we go...
Marx caused a century-long wrong turn in the in the social sciences, and this caused a corresponding wrong turn in how the entire Western World understands both human political behavior as well as the underlying substance of politics, i.e., making policy choices that encourage human flourishing.
- Marxian thought is fundamentally Newtonian, with billiard ball chains of causation.
- But in any field that involves living things, Newton must be rejected in favor of Darwin.
- The methods of biology are inconsistent with the methods of physics. (See, here.)
- Billiard ball causation must be replaced with webs of causation.
- The metaphor of the causal chain must be replaced with the metaphor of the ecosystem of causation.
- Words like “force” and “power” applied to human behavior are metaphors from physics and are in-apt.
- Once you adopt wrong metaphors into the language it is impossible to express reality in those terms. The claim “Rape is about power” is neither true nor false. Rather, it is nonsense.
My hypothesis is that the crucial injection of Marx into the course of intellectual history is caused by the success of the October Revolution in Russia. So Thorstein Veblen writing in 1896 can be pre-Marxian detour even though the Communist Manifesto was published in 1848. Note that the Revolutions Of 1848 in Europe were already under way in Europe as the Manifesto was published. Socialism and communism were ideas that would have existed with or without Marx and they are part of the milieu that formed Veblen’s world. I’m not arguing that Veblen’s paper “Why economics is not an evolutionary science” precedes socialism.
The October Revolution is part of the definition of the English term “Karl Marx.” Bolshevism would not exist but for Marxism, and Marx would not have mattered at all for my purposes but for Bolshevism. You cannot seperate the influence of Marx from the historical violence committed in his name. Ironically, the belief of academics and activists that you can seperate Marx from violence is one of the most important things about Marx. Imagine how powerful the KKK would be if there were Harvard professors in 2018 AD who believed in a fundamentally peaceful, if racist, theory promoted by Nathan Bedford Forrest that was unfairly brought down by the historical accident of violence committed in Forrest’s name!
But that’s exactly what happened with Marx, starting in 1919.
- The normalization of ideology politics.
- The political spectrum metaphor and the Newtonian understanding of political behavior, generally.
- The idea that the New Deal had an intellectual foundation.
- The response by the National Review fashioning an intellectual foundation for “conservatism.”
- The success of the takeover of the GOP by robber barons in coalition with racists under the cover of “conservatism.”
- The background frame for Post War journalism of “balance equals truth.”
- Persistence of rationality as the foundation of economics.
- The endless confusion of “intersectionality” as a way to understand human behavior.
- The prominence of literary approaches to matters of behavioral science such as human sexuality, identity, and in-group/out-group distinctions.
- The idiotic idea that “cultural appropriation” is a useful category of bad behavior.
- Fascism in Italy, Germany, and Spain.
- More to come...
Thorstein Veblen describes the non-science of classical economics, in “Why economics is not an evolutionary science.” This is an 1898 description of what not to do: